Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robert Nussbaum's avatar

That all makes perfect sense in "the sky is falling" scenario. And I will not subscribe to that philosohy, not yet. The glass may be more than half empty, but if we throw up our hands in despair, we will die of thirst next November. As to Kamala, what VP ever shines? It is a ceremonial post and she does not have the power, good or bad, to move the needle on matters of import. I hear your angst. I just am fighting my own. Don't give up hope.

Expand full comment
Marvin Weishaus's avatar

Unfortunately, this soup will never boil. You give the electorate too much credit - there is overwhelming evidence even now that Biden has guided the ship through the covid fallout, socially and economically, with a steady hand, and set us on an infinitely more ever-keeled course than the bombastic chaos of his predecessor - and yet he gets credit for none of it. Why will it be any different a year from now? No matter how rosy the economy looks on paper at that time, or even if (highly unlikely) the Ukraine crisis ends, or if there is sensible legislation passed on immigration or guns (even more impossible) a vote for Biden will still be internalized as a vote for a cognitively-decaying geriatric president, or worse as this article implies, as a vote for Kamala, albeit with delayed implementation. The same pervasive forces - (essentially pure unbridled stupidity) that govern the perceptions of the electorate, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary (the election was stolen, January 6 was actually the work of leftist agitators, Trump is a victim of a renegade partisan justice department, climate change is a hoax, etc. etc. ) - are at work here also. Too many people have already made up their minds about Joe, and will not look past their preconceptions and see the evidence in front of them. Not now, and not a year from now. I think Biden has done a masterful job in a no-win situation, infrastructure bill and all, and I wish him well. I would vote for a decaying heap of garbage before voting for Trump (kind of the same thing), but the realist in me says that both Biden and Harris need to step aside, and soon, because the danger of them running and losing to that lunatic is too great. It seems very likely given Trump's mastery of subverting the judicial process, that there will be no final verdict on any of the 91 felonies before election day 2024. And even if there was, or the 14th amendment has teeth, a more vibrant, reasonable republican could present an insurmountable challenge to good old Joe. He needs to think of the greater good and do what's best for the country. The question is...who?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts